“There’s an App for That!” is now an Apple Trade Mark

Most large and successful brands are very trade mark conscious, often verging on being aggressive.   And non more so than Apple Inc.  Apple is now the owner of the ubiquitous catchphrase “There’s an App for That.”  Apple Inc owns the registered Australian trade mark no. 1374498 for “THERE’S AN APP FOR THAT” in relation to various goods and services, primarily for electronic devices (such as phones), retailing and telecommunications.  Apple had the foresight to file the trademark application (in the US then subsequently in Australia) not too long after the phrase was first used, namely in December 2009.

The “There’s an app for that,” tagline plays a large role in Apple’s marketing and advertising initiatives around the iPhone and all other iOS devices. The phrase has become so popular that it has permeated pop culture and become repurposed and parodied in a number of fashions. It makes sense, then, that Apple would want to trademark the phrase and prevent other businesses from profiting by the commercial use of the phrase without its consent.

Contrary to common misconception, this does not mean that the average person can now no longer cry “there’s an app for that!”, or even that a trade in mobile devices cannot use the phrase.  However, it does mean that a trader of mobile devices cannot sell things under the “brand” of “there’s an app for that”.

The trade mark, in my view, is a strategy to discourage the increasingly popular new mobile devices, such as Android, from using the slogan.

The lessons:

  • Even if not your main brand, a trade mark registration can be used as a disincentive to others
  • Slogans can be trade marked
  • Be proactive about your intellectual property – you don’t have to throw the same amount of funds towards IP as Apple, but it’s good to be aware of how you can use IP law to your gain.

 

 

Share this post on your networks

Related Posts

Schapelle Corby’s family wins copyright case

The family of convicted drug smuggler Schapelle Corby has been awarded $50,000 in damages for a copyright infringement stemming from photographs published in the book Sins of the Father.  The book, published in 2011 by Allen & Urwin and written by investigative journalist Eamonn Duff, is described as the “explosive untold story of Schapelle Corby

Read More »

Google Adwords now allows trademarks as keywords

As of 23 April 2013, the Google Adwords policy now allows advertisers to purchase and use another party’s trade mark as a keyword to trigger a Google Ad.  This means that a party can use a competitor’s trade mark as a keywords to trigger its own Google Ad selling similar products or services.  See here

Read More »

The differences between trade marks, copyright and patents

There is often confusion about the differences between trade marks, patents and copyright.  This is no surprise as the law in this area is quite complex and very conceptual.  This post provides a brief overview of the differences. But firstly, let’s start with the similarities. The reason that trade marks,  copyright and patents are often

Read More »
Get In Touch

Contact Us

We are here to help you and aim to respond within 24 hours.